Saturday Morning Open Thread: We Never Give Up
17 minutes ago
News and commentary on why America needs Barack Obama at this moment in our history.
I am watching Meet the Press and heard presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin (bar none the most authoritative voice I've heard on presidential history) make an excellent point in response to a statement by New York Times commentator David Brooks to the effect of "You really have to wonder how Obama can bring about this 'change' and 'unity' with these 70-year-old committee chairmen on the Hill."
Her response was highly elucidating:
"What history argues -- and I think that this is what [Obama] is arguing -- is that the only time we've seen progressive change in this country is when the country is mobilized to push the people in Congress to action.
That's what happened in the progressive movement at the turn of the century; that's what happened in the New Deal; that's what happened in the 60s.
I think that's what he's arguing -- I can't just get it done by myself; I need to have that movement out there that will push us in Washington (me and them included) [to make that change happen]."
5 comments:
Here's a comment I left on another site about this article:
Essentially, what I think Doris Kearns Goodwin (an unflappable nonpartisan expert on this particular topic) was making the point that really, at its root, his movement is more about the people and their desire at this moment (especially after 8 years of Bush) for significant progressive change and, ultimately, he has been chosen by this movement as their standard bearer. The change movement is tied to him as a figure but exists as well as an independent force that has him as the catalyst for their coming together. As a result, it doesn't really matter whether the movement preceded a president's candidacy (like with Kennedy) or happened while the President was already in office (like LBJ to some extent). Very interesting stuff, I'm glad she was able to put it into historical context.
On the most basic of levels, Hillary accussed Barack of plagiarism. Then moments later
committed plagiarism herself... something she had planned to do when she made the accusation of Obama. This is indeed a petty matter. What matters is that Hillary seems to think she has a different set of rules to follow.
Since this seems to be the attack mode she favors, she has used it endlessly, even when she commits
the exact error minutes later. Lets not forget her attacks are
most always in error and and beneath a US Senator. Shame on you
Ms. Clinton. We see right through you.
And this is why we need to elect Obama type Democrats to the House and Senate in November. We need to give him the people that will help him move this change forward.
Wow, this is a great article. We need to dig this up!
I'll add a link on my blog.
Obama 08!
Thanks Vickie! Here's the Digg link: http://www.digg.com/political_opinion/How_Obama_Can_Effect_Change
Post a Comment